// Copyright (c) 2006 IBM ICU Tech Mtg 05 April 2006 (no attendee list) x utext todo: andy to look at documentation of provider responsibilities issue with snapping indices to start of character utf8 split across chunk boundaries. two halves of surrogate pair have to be independently addressable todo: andy to formulate consistent set of rules, surrogates split across 1K chunks mark suggests naming the two kinds of buffer differently andy: is there an immediate need to support discontiguous utf8 strings? andy: ported breakiterator to utext underneath, debugging might like to provide 'hasPrev' and 'hasNext' to api. ok? todo for supplementary character support x supplementary chars in dictionary break code andy: do current dictionaries not have supplementaries? deb: explicitly a utf16 dictionary. can support supplementaries, but represents as surrogate pairs some places expect 1 codepoint == 1 code unit. andy: since utext returns codepoints not code units, need some cruft at the moment for those assumptions. can we leave this as a todo? deb: aren't and won't be dictionaries for 'SA' languages. andy: will probably sit there as a todo, then deb: make sure there's a jitterbug. yes, we can defer. todo: andy to file separate jitterbug on this todo: deb to think of a simple way to fix it x time zone issues todo: steven to contact vladimir and synch up x vladimir looking at porting time zone changes (for new tz database 2006c) and getting them integrated mark suggests we divorce ourselves from the tz patch. take current version plus the patch. then put tests into place to verify that we get the same results as any future version of the binary. vladimir is looking at that. todo: mark to request vladimir look at yoshito's proposal x tex: working with php group on unicode support every programming language looks like it should use icu, but at the same time they also have to do the same kinds of things to adapt to icu. we should write a set of api or wrappers or come up with an approach for programming languages to adapt to icu. help the outlying languages to pick it up. george: d, parrot, perl, php, all have their own separate requirements (code page support, c/c++) doesn't see commonality mark: perhaps we should query the people involved and get their feedback? might have suggestions for us. tex: different levels here, not worrying about c/c++. not saying icu is hard for them. thinks there's a commonality. andy: if it was harder than it needed to be to use icu in php we'd like to know todo: tex to bring it up as a discussion topic at conference todo: andy to look through resumes and get back to george, he will 'checkbox' the cal poly site and see who is still interested. we should all scan the resumes and filter out folks who we really don't want to contact. then we find out who is interested in us, and phone screen them. select best two/three to interview.